Although Brown was an abolitionist, his ideas were very different from the majority of his peers. While others believed in political and moral changes, Brown became convinced that the only way to solve this problem was through violence. He saw the refusal of Southern slaveholders to change their views and the lack of support from the government, as shown in the Dred Scott decision, both of which convinced him that no amount of political maneuvering could make the changes which he deemed necessary. Another reason Brown believed in using violence was because he began to see himself as God’s chosen champion to lead the crusade against slavery and therefore he could do no wrong because the actions which he took were God’s will.
At first, Brown began his campaign against slavery by assisting slaves in escaping through the Underground Railroad and by establishing and assisting organizations dedicated to helping runaway slaves. However, his means soon became more violent, starting with his response to the sacking of the anti-slavery town of Lawrence in Kansas. He and a group of 6 other men, including 4 of his sons, retaliated against the pro-slavery community by murdering 5 pro-slavery settlers in what would become known as the Pottawatomie Massacre. This massacre was one of the major factors which started the conflicts of Bleeding Kansas. Brown then followed this up with a raid in Missouri, killing a slave owner and freeing his 11 slaves. These events allowed Brown to build his reputation among Northern abolitionists. In addition, through his friend Franklin Sanborn, a well known and respected New England abolitionist, he was introduced to many other Northern abolitionists further developing his reputation.
After spending two and a half years gathering resources and manpower, Brown launched his infamous attack on the federal arsenal at Harper’s Ferry, Virginia with 21 other men. Brown’s plan was to arm slaves to lead a rebellion, but he was defeated by militia and U.S. Marines led by Robert E. Lee. When news spread, at first most Northern abolitionists saw him as insane and delusional. However, due to his many connections with respected Northerners like Sanford and the transcendentalists Henry David Thoreau and Ralph Waldo Emerson, public opinion quickly shifted from considering him a madman to considering him a martyr. In particular, Thoreau delivered a speech, “A Plea for Captain John Brown,” defending the ideals which he fought for. Although at first the South believed his raid was not a major problem, the positive Northern view of Brown enraged them. Due to both the Northern view of Brown as a martyr and Brown’s financial backing from a few Northern abolitionists, the South became convinced that all abolitionists wished to use violent means to end slavery. They saw how the North treated Brown, a man who had threatened their way of life, as a hero, rapidly accelerating the South’s path to secession.
https://www.civilwar.org/learn/biographies/john-brown
https://www.civilwar.org/learn/articles/abolitionists-john-brown
http://www.history.com/topics/john-brown
http://www.historynet.com/john-brown
Shawn I enjoyed the narrative style of your article, as well as the introduction of personal details and motivations of John Brown. In particular, I was interested by his religious justification, that God's will was for him to commit violence to end slavery. Why is it that religion so often plays a role in violence? Are Brown's actions justified by the fact that he is fighting to end slavery?
ReplyDeleteI really like how organized and easy to follow your article is. I like how you ordered the events in chronological order so that it's easy to follow how his eventually polarized views developed and what lead to his ultimate demise. As I was reading, I wondered why it is that he believed him and his small troupe of 21 men could have beaten Confederate forces lead by legendary General Lee. It's interesting how someone's beliefs can result in such insurrection and severe action.
ReplyDeleteShawn, I thought your blog post was very insightful and interesting. I thought it was cool that Brown used the Underground Railroad as an early way to show his opposition against slavery. However, you go on to say that Brown then went on to become more violent- killing a plantation owner and releasing his 11 slaves. I wonder, what was the reason that he switched so suddenly from passive-> active/violent opposition. I read more into how Brown was martyrized in the north: Because brown was one of the few individuals who spoke out about the evils of slavery so early on, even his violent acts were justified since they aimed to free the enslaved from the bondage of their masters. To what extent do you think John Brown's raid on Harper's ferry stimulated Northern/Southern sectionalism?
ReplyDelete