In the fifty years since the end of the Civil War the field of medicine had seen very few advancements, however, during the First World War medicine took a giant leap forward. Numerous advancements led to the increased survival rates of the war from the Civil War. These advancements include things such as better transportation, improved methods of disinfection, advanced detection systems, and the introduction of new surgical methods.
Prior to and at the beginning of the First World War, amputation was the primary method for solving medical problems. As a result, countless unnecessary amputations of soldiers' limbs occurred. Thankfully, in the war the system of ambulances that became established helped to significantly decrease this number. The ambulances allowed for soldiers to be taken from the battlefield and to nearby hospitals with enough time for the doctors to disinfect the wound and repair it without having to amputate. Before the ambulances, transporting patients to the hospital was a long task that often would do more harm than good, and thanks to the increased amount of attention that medical units got during the First World War they had enough resources and ambulances in order to provide the necessary care to the injured soldiers. Not only were these medical units more prevalent in the fields, but they were strategically placed on the battlefront in order to ensure the survival of more soldiers. In fact, in 1917 when the United States entered the war there was no established medical unit, so to have such incredible medical care for the time by the end of the war shows how fast medicine advanced during this period. An example of how technological improvements allowed for more survivors can be found in the use of the X-ray machine. Beginning in France during the war, mobile X-ray units were developed which allowed doctors to detect bullets and shrapnel in wounds. This method of detection allowed for these foreign objects to be more efficiently removed, thereby decreasing the invasiveness of surgeries and allowing more soldiers to live.
In addition to the presence of medicine in war having been greatly increased, the methods of treating injuries also significantly improved. One improvement that allowed for a greater survival rate was the Carrel-Dakin Method. The Carrel-Dakin Method was a method of disinfection that not only stopped the spread of infection but was one of the factors that allowed doctors to branch out from amputation as the primary method of stopping infections. Doctors also began to increase their knowledge of diseases and how they spread, especially in the medical settings in which they worked. In order to prevent the spread of disease, which had been what actually killed a lot of people during the Civil War as opposed to their wounds, they began to increase the rate at which they administered vaccinations. Vaccinations are still used as a method of disease control today, demonstrating how effective they are in preventing both civilians and soldiers from falling ill. Also, the Thomas Splint increased the rate of survival for soldiers with broken femurs (thigh bones) to skyrocket from twenty percent to eighty percent. This simple splint allowed for a sixty percent increase in survivors, not only creating a more positive view of the field doctors but creating a whole new job within the medical professionals, bonesetters. In terms of surgery during the First World War, there were multiple advancements that made it more effective. The most significant of these advancements was the introduction of a new method of general anesthesia. Nitrous Oxide-Oxygen mixture was introduced as one of the first general anesthetics that put the patient to sleep without putting them into shock, allowing for surgeries to be performed with less pain for the patient. Finally, the First World War sparked an evolution in facial reconstructive surgery. For soldiers having been marred by the battlefield, they could now elect to have surgeries performed to decrease the physical and emotional effects of these wounds. This allowed these soldiers to function more normally, if their wounds hindered normal facial function, or to feel better about themselves simply because they looked better. The First World War was a time of major STEM advancement, especially in the field of medicine, introducing methods and concepts still utilized today.
Sources
https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2017/02/world-war-i-medicine/517656/
http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-wales-28678392
https://www.ncpedia.org/wwi-medicine-battlefield
I found your article to be incredibly interesting Alex, and important as well because it reveals a side of the war that most people don't see or think about. The Carrel-Dakin method was a large step forward for antiseptic medicine at the time, and it combined the ingenuity of the French physician Carrel and the invention of English chemist Dakin to create a simple, yet highly effective method of sterilization. A question that I have, not specifically regarding your article but in many ways related, is whether or not conflict breeds ingenuity and innovation. As you mentioned in your piece, STEM experience a period of advancement during WWI, and in WWII there was a similar trend. Does this go to show that conflict leads to innovation? What does that say about how we should develop new technologies today? Just some food for thought.
ReplyDeletehttps://www.rtbf.be/ww1/topics/detail_the-carrel-dakin-method?id=8356084
Alex, your analysis and explanation of Medicine in World War I was very informative and clearly explained the impacts that advanced medicine made on the outcomes of the war. As described in your post, the Civil War served to spur the development of more advanced medical practices such as the refining of amputation, and medical practices improved in the first world war. As Henry stated, it's interesting to see how conflict, as seen through wars, can lead to innovation, which evidently influences the results of conflicts. However, in the case of innovation, it is not really the armed conflict that causes innovation, but rather the conflict of ideas that brings progress. Science, which conflicted with previous medical practices, brought advancements such as the Carrel-Dakin method. This phenomenon is known as "healthy conflict," in which the conflict occurs from a diversity of ideas, which is necessary for innovation. A question I had in response to your article and this idea of innovation is: even though technology and medicine is improving after each war, why did war casualties increase after each war? (i.e. World War I to World War II)
ReplyDeletehttps://www.linkedin.com/pulse/20140702100611-12357314-conflict-is-necessary-for-innovation