The first 5 points outlined the rules for international conduct, ranging from freedom of the seas and trade, to the restriction of armed forces. The next 8 points called for territorial adjustments within Europe, including colonial lands and territory gained in the war. The 14th, and last point called for, “A general association of nations … affording mutual guarantees of political independence and territorial integrity to great and small states alike,” which eventually resulted in the creation of the League of Nations.
While these points were seen as the basis for the American treatment of the peace, the reality was far from the ideal outcome. After hearing of his points, Germany agreed to negotiate with Wilson, giving him great power over the other European nations, but at The Paris Peace Conference, Wilson found it hard to stick to his ideals. Receiving pressure from David Lloyd George of Britain, Vittorio Emanuele Orlando of Italy, and Georges Clemenceau of France, Wilson was forced to change his position into a very anti-German treaty. One of the biggest difference from Wilson’s points and the Treaty of Versailles came in the form of the War Guilt Clause, which assigned the blame for the war entirely on the shoulders of the Germans, causing Wilson’s hope of “peace without victory” out the window. German was forced to pay 269 billion marks as reparation for the war, an amount impossible for them to pay, even disregarding their failing industries due to war damage.
While the ideas in Wilson’s fourteen points may have secured peace in an ideal setting, the outcome of the Paris Peace Conference caused many Germans to be angered over its disparities from Wilson’s initial speech. In the end, tensions over the treaty eventually would lead to the start of the World's next war, WW2.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI liked how you started by giving us a brief summary of Wilson's fourteen points, then proceeded to explain how Wilson struggled to stick to his ideals and was eventually forced to switch his position on certain topics. However, even some of the points that Wilson was able to get through were ultimately unsuccessful. The League of Nations that Wilson pushed for so fervently only lasted around 26 years, ultimately unsuccessful in preserving world peace, and the rules for international conduct that Wilson pushed for lead to more tension. Overall, it is clear that the ideals of Wilson's fourteen points the Treaty of Versailles were unsuccessful and even somewhat contributed to the start of WW2.
ReplyDeletehttps://www.historyonthenet.com/why-did-the-league-of-nations-fail/
Ryan's viewpoint of the ultimate failure of the League of Nations is interesting. The League of Nations ultimately collapsed at the break of World War II despite Germany's membership. Because of the League's inability to achieve disarmament, universal membership, and confrontation between key members, the League had little power in the state of international affairs and simply acted as a pretense. Later on, the League would be rebuilt after World War II as the United Nations with more power and focus on collective security. However, it is unclear whether or not it is Wilson's points that contributed to the start of World War II, or the failure of other countries to pass it. Recall that Wilson wanted to focus on "peace with victory", while Great Britain and France wanted to severely punish Germany with great war reparations that ultimately contributed to Germany's economic decimation. This economic depression would prove to be fertile ground for Nazism and facism to take root in both Italy and Germany.
ReplyDeletehttp://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.558.7279&rep=rep1&type=pdf
http://www2.sunysuffolk.edu/westn/causeww2.html
I thought it was intriguing how you described why the fourteen points ultimately failed. It is also interesting to look at some of the lasting effect of Wilson's diplomacy during this time period. His unwavering pressure on making sure the US becomes a part of the League likely lead to Warren Harding's victory over Wilson in the following election. Perhaps if Wilson had compromise the public wouldn't have view it as such a failure and put Wilson back in office.
ReplyDeletehttps://www.americanhistoryusa.com/fourteen-points-league-of-nations-wilsons-failed-idealism/