Sunday, April 29, 2018

Pop Art


The 50’s were a time of continued American economic growth following World War II. Although many remained constrained by their fear of the Cold War, many Americans also achieved unprecedented levels of success and security. Many families moved out of the cities into the suburbs and their cookie cutter houses, and manufacturing industries were at an all time high. This inspired a culture of consumerism, where in many people’s eyes, status was all based on what you had better than your neighbor. This, in turn, would inspire a movement among the artists: pop art.
Developed in the mid-50’s and rooted in the Dada movement, pop art was art that responded to trends in everyday life. Artists took inspiration from the conflict with the Soviet Union, consumerism, and the beginnings of the counterculture that would take hold during the 60’s. Many artists directly used materials and images from mass goods and media. For example, Andy Warhol’s famous prints include depictions of Marilyn Monroe, Campbell’s soup cans, and dollar signs. Artistic style was mostly characterized by realism with bold colors and using printmaking to produce multiple copies of their artwork. This was a reflection of the commercialism of the time, and how mass production was so easy to do that artistic originality was basically dead. Many artists began to use different types of mixed media in order to better connect history, culture, and art with each other.

Pop art first displayed in New York, and really took off during the 60’s in Los Angeles. Pop art was not limited to just America, many British artists took the style as well and began producing artworks in the same vein. However, American pop art tended to be more disillusioned with the incessant marketing of society, and tones tended to be more dramatic. As an example, Roy Lichtenstein, an American artist, had a style that was heavily influenced by comic books, which were a popular form of mass production of the time. Since Britain was still recovering from World War II at the time, their society tended to be less commercialized, as did their art.  

Pop art did not necessarily criticize popular culture, it merely explored and took from it. In previous decades, American art had been heavily influenced by nature and religion, like the Transcendentalism of Henry David Thoreau. In the 50’s, however, mass media made it so that American artists were more exposed to it. Pop art reflected the mass population’s own feelings, and was less avant garde in the way that a wider audience was already more connected to it. Clearly, the pop art movement was a response to the culture that had developed during the 50’s.

Sources

The Severity of the Civil Rights Movement and Viola Liuzzo

The Severity of the Civil Rights Movement and Viola Liuzzo
       
          In mid-March of 1965, the Selma to Montgomery marches, including "Bloody Sunday," occurred to demonstrate the severe want for true voting rights. However, the outcome was one that was filled with danger and hostility. For example, state troopers attacked the marchers and demonstrators. To be more specific, eighty men, women, and children were hospitalized. The demonstrations and hostility were televised which was a significant factor in the American public's perception of the ordeal and wish to support voting rights for African-Americans. It allowed many across the country to fully realize the true racial conflict in the United States. A chain of emotion, disgust, and aggression was set off at this time. In response, President Lyndon B. Johnson connected this to Civil War times and wished for progress or an eventual end to this conflict. Of course, an unsettling amount of injuries and deaths of black individuals resulted from these marches and the Civil Rights Movement in general. However, the hostility was so strong during this time that this even resulted in the death of a white woman, Viola Liuzzo. Liuzzo was the only white woman killed in connection to the Civil Rights Movement. The story that surrounds her death simply goes to show the true tension that surrounded the Civil Rights Movement and how increasingly chaotic it got.



          Viola Liuzzo was one of the many Americans who viewed the disgusting acts of "Bloody Sunday" on television. She was already socially active by being part of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People in Detroit. In response, to the televised images of "Bloody Sunday," Liuzzo wished to help and effort in the cause herself. Liuzzo participated in the march from Selma to Montgomery which began on March 21, 1965. Liuzzo, in addition, helping many of the demonstrators by being a driver for individuals traveling back and forth between Selma and Montgomery. Finally, on March 25, 1965, Martin Luther King Jr. performed a speech at the Montgomery capitol building. During the night that followed, the only white woman's death in connection to the Civil Rights Movement would occur. Liuzzo was driving a teenaged black man, Leroy Moton to Selma via Highway 80. During this trip, someone in a passing vehicle shot and killed her. The passenger, Moton, apparently survived only due to him pretending to be dead after the car drifted into a ditch on the side of the highway. It was later televised who the culprits were and it was revealed that one of four individuals in the passing car was an FBI informant, Gary Thomas Rowe. Strikingly, all four of the individuals were affiliated with the Ku Klux Klan.
          Following Viola Liuzzo's death, much false information began to surface regarding the woman's character. Most intriguing about this was that the FBI director, J. Edgar Hoover, was supposedly the one instigating such spilling of false information. Such information included how she was supposedly a terrible mother, a horrendous housewife, and in a relationship with the African-American she was driving. A court case still continued to occur which resulted in all the culprits excluding the FBI informant to be sentenced to ten years in prison. However, one of the three men died of unrelated issues before he was sentenced. Rowe, the FBI informant, received immunity from the prosecution. However, the remaining two men both later revealed that Rowe was the individual who actually shot Viola Liuzzo. Due to Rowe's gained immunity, these murder charges did not affect him.
          A bizarre and eerie feel results from learning about the death of Viola Liuzzo. Her death truly shows the severe place that the United States of America was in during this controversial time in the 1960s. With such a shady example filled with the FBI, a sharpshooter, and an attack on a dead white woman's reputation, one can truly see how chaotic the Civil Rights Movement was.

Check out President Johnson's address on Liuzzo: https://millercenter.org/the-presidency/presidential-speeches/march-26-1965-statement-arrests-violo-liuzzo-murder
https://www.biography.com/people/viola-gregg-liuzzo-370152
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/retropolis/wp/2017/12/15/a-white-mother-went-to-alabama-to-fight-for-civil-rights-the-klan-killed-her-for-it/?utm_term=.1f0018956e0b
Image: http://spartacus-educational.com/USAliuzzo.htm

Spain, France, and England: treating the Natives

As we know, England was not the only colonizer of the Americas. Spain claimed the South, covering vast amounts of modern day Mexico and parts of the US, and France claimed the North, now Canada. This begs the question, how did each colonizing nation treat the Native Americans?

Spain:

The Spanish were brutal and exploitive of the natives. They established a hierarchical system with Spaniards at the top and natives at the bottom. Under Spanish rule, Native Americans were essentially enslaved to the fields, the mines, and as servants; plus, they had to pay tribute, where every month or so each Indian was forced to pay a certain sum of gold, and if they didn't, they would be executed. Catholicism was also imposed on the tribes and empires. Also, the encomienda system was established, where, when the Spanish government granted land, that grant included any native inhabitants as their slaves. As a result, many Natives fled, and those who were caught were treated as prisoners of war. Finally, there was the mission system, where priests actually bothered to learn the local language and then convert people in village communities. This was fairly successful. The Spanish mistreated the Natives, but as a result of all their close affairs with them, they intermarried and created the mestizo class.

England:

While the Spanish were true settlers, mostly men of rank, the English colonizers were mostly families wanting to start a new life. There was some effort to enslave and convert the Indians, but they were much weaker and mostly failed. The relationship between the English and the Natives was founded on trade and land. In both cases, the Indians lost after white hunters killed all their fur prey, and then attempted to buy their land. The pattern to notice was that there was trade, attempts to secure land, misunderstanding, and conflict with each westward movement. One of the most important contrasts with the Spanish settlers was the absence of intermarriage -- Americans saw themselves as above intermarriage with the "savages".

France:

The French presence in North America was exceptional, as they actually had good relations with the Natives. They came mainly to trade furs, not settle land. They worked together with the Indians in hunting, and even learned the languages! When they settled their first city of Quebec, they kept these ties. They had the highest intermarriage rate of all. Of course, the French weren't so righteous. In the West Indies, alongside Britain and Spain, they held slave societies where treatment was so harsh that the death rate exceeded the birth rate, thus the constant importations of new slaves was necessary. Abolition in the 1820's allowed for these colonies to rebel and liberate themselves.

Each empire criticized the others' treatment of the Natives and used that criticism as evidence that their own ways were best.

https://www.enotes.com/homework-help/how-did-spain-france-england-treat-native-496372
https://www.encyclopedia.com/history/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/native-americans-treatment-spain-vs-england-issue
https://ancestralfindings.com/the-french-and-native-american-relations/
https://www.wikiwand.com/en/Slavery_in_the_British_and_French_Caribbean#/Abolition

The Immigration Act of 1965

The Immigration Act of 1965 was issued to establish a new form of immigration policy that abolished national quotas set during the 1920's. This countered the idea of nativism, which was prominent in the early 20th century. The Emergency Quota Act in 1921 severely reduced the number of people that could migrate to the United States every year, and the quota system wasn't changed much since then.

As nativism started to die down towards the mid 20th century, there began to be increasing opposition against the quota systems. Foreigners who wanted to come over to the United States largely believed that the quotas discriminated against them. Even President Kennedy stated that the immigration policy could not be tolerated and gave a speech for immigration reform in 1963. Although Kennedy wasn't able to enforce a legislation to abolish the immigration quotas due to his assassination, his successor, Lyndon B. Johnson, was able to sign the bill in October 1965.

While the legislation was able to abolish quotas, it "did place caps on per-country and total immigration, as well as caps on each category." However, these caps were very large, and it did not inhibit many immigrants from coming over. The caps were also completely different from the former immigration policy as the quotas from 1929 gave over 1/3 of the annual immigration slots to Germans. It "banned discrimination in the issuance of immigrant visas based on 'race, sex, nationality, place of birth, or place of residence.'"

One major change that the legislation brought about was the support for family unification and skilled labor. If someone had a family members living in the United States, he/she could also immigrate over and join the rest of his/her family. Additionally, people who were adept and seeking jobs in the United States were also preferred. As a result of these two preferences, there was the prevalence of chain immigration, which was the idea that one person migrating to the United States would lead to more family members coming over.

The Immigration Act of 1965 has led to a significant impact in terms of the diverse population in the United States today. Prior to the legislation, immigrants primarily came in from Southern and Eastern Europe. However, after it was enforced, people started to come from a variety of regions, primarily Asia and Latin America. At the beginning, many immigrants fled to the United States due to conflicts such as the Vietnam War. Afterwards, most people came over in seek of new opportunities. While the immigration policy has led to an increase of migration to the United States, there is also debate concerning illegal immigration, which is still an important topic today.

Sources:
https://www.history.com/topics/us-immigration-since-1965
https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/geopolitical-origins-us-immigration-act-1965


The First Red Scare

While America had a widespread fear of communism throughout the Cold War, this fear was instilled long ago. The First Red Scare started in 1917 and was an anti-communist movement in response to the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia. The Bolshevik Revolution led to the change towards a communist government in Russia, and this was during a time when the First World War was still going on. Americans were afraid that Russia would let down its allies, and they feared the spread of communism.

Additionally, during this period, many immigrants from Southern and Eastern Europe were coming to America. As there was a strong sentiment towards nativism, many Americans disliked immigrants because they believed that the foreigners were taking over their jobs and increasing competition. They created the fear that the mass immigration could result in the spread of communism in the United States.

During the war, the government issued the Espionage Act in 1917 and later the Sedition Act in 1918, which "made it a crime for any person to convey information intended to interfere with the U.S. armed forces prosecution of the war effort or to promote the success of the country’s enemies." While this was intended mostly to suppress anti-war activists, these acts were also used to prosecute suspected communists during the First Red Scare.

The fear of communism grew even larger in the autumn of 1919 when there were a series of race riots and strikes known as Red Summer. The strikes also involved anarchist violence as there were bombs being exploded in cities. Americans referenced the assassination of President McKinley as he was also killed by an anarchist. Americans believed that things were getting out of hand, and they mostly blamed this on communists, who were associated with anarchists.

In response to the public fear, Attorney General Palmer led the Palmer Raids. On New Year's Day of 1920, over 6,000 foreigners were arrested under the accusation that they were supporting communism. This event led to a significant opposition from the American public as they saw civil liberties being violated. The Palmer Raids led to the end of the First Red Scare, but there was still some fear of communism throughout the 1920's and 1930's until the Second World War when Russia had a common goal with the United States to take down Germany. Obviously, after World War II, the widespread fear of communism known as the Second Red Scare came back again and led to further tensions in the Cold War.

Overall, the First Red Scare can be seen to be an important event in American history. It highlights how there were irrational fears of communism from the public before the Cold War and how a culmination of events together (Bolshevik Revolution, mass immigration and nativism, assassination of President McKinley, and Red Summer) can influence such a widespread fear from Americans.

Sources
http://www.ohiohistorycentral.org/w/First_Red_Scare
https://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/modern-world-history-1918-to-1980/america-1918-1939/the-red-scare-in-the-1920/
https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/u-s-congress-passes-espionage-act

Discrimination in Los Altos (and the 1960s)

"No person other than those of the White or Caucasian race shall use or occupy any premise or building theron except that such persons may be employed and housed in the capacity of a servant or domestic of resident."

Such is written by William D. Wasson about the stipulations that had to be kept in order for him to sell his property. This clause was not added during the Gilded Age or the 1800s, neither was it written in the deep South. This contract between Mr. Wasson and the property's purchaser was written in September of 1943 in Los Altos, California. To be more exact, the property William D. Wasson was selling was a plot of land on the Jordan Tract (currently Jordan Avenue) where my house currently stands.
Ku Klux Klan parade on East Main Street in Ashland, Ore., in the 1920s. (Oregon Historical Society)
While many assume that the South was the region where racism was legally enforced following the Civil War, many Northern states also had extreme prejudice. In addition to individuals like Wasson preventing housing opportunities by legally preventing buyers from renting property to non-White people, White supreme organizations were able to gain more direct control over state governments.
The KKK saw a rise in membership during the 1920s as nationalism swept the country under the idea of "America for Americans" (foreshadowing the Japanese idea of "Asia for Asians"). This growth was not limited to the South as the KKK gained control in Oregon and 6 other states. In fact, the largest KKK membership West of the Mississippi River was in Oregon. Seemingly liberal states such as Oregon and California have surprisingly --and disturbingly-- racist pasts. When Oregon entered the Union in 1859 it did so as a “whites-only” state; the state constitution excluded nonwhites from living there. Oregon's racist beginnings continued to impact the state into the 1920s. In 1922, Walter Pierce, a member of the Ku Klux Klan, was elected governor of Oregon and later served for 10 years as a member of the U.S. House of Representatives.

Acts of racism strengthened in the Bay Area during the 1930s. The Watsonville riots began after the opening of a dance club where Filipino men could allegedly pay to dance with white girls. Violent riots lasted roughly for five days in San Francisco, Stockton, San Jose and Salinas, culminating in the death of 22-year-old Fermin Tobera. In 1965, the oppressed Filipino farmers would begin organizing to protest their harsh working conditions and joining forces with the newly emerging Latino rights organization lead by Cesar Chavez. 

The oppression of minorities and immigrants was widespread in America. Just because we live in California, we cannot believe that the North and West held morally superior and equal views of all people. White supremacy and the idea that minority races are nothing more than "servants" lasted far past Reconstruction and was far wider than the South.

Sites
"The 1920s" Worksheet
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/retropolis/wp/2017/06/07/when-portland-banned-blacks-oregons-shameful-history-as-an-all-white-state/
http://www.santacruzsentinel.com/article/ZZ/20110904/NEWS/110908006
Contract between William D. Wasson and purchaser of plot (passed down from previous owners of our house)

President William McKinley

On January 29, 1843 in Niles, Ohio, the 25th president of the United States, William McKinley, was born. In his early life, William McKinley served in the Union Army, starting as a private and eventually working his way up to brevet major. Years later, in 1877,  he was elected to Congress, where he acted as a Republican representative for Ohio and the chair of the House Ways and Means Committee. He supported high tariffs on imported goods and was later blamed for raising prices and moved back to Ohio after 14 years in the House, where he ran for and won the position of governor. He served two terms as the governor of Ohio and in 1896 decided to run for the presidency.

During the election, the issue of free silver was large in the minds of many Americans, causing dissent in both the Democratic and Republican parties. McKinley decided to follow the gold standard, going against the Democratic nominee, William Jennings Bryan, who supported free silver and attacked the gold standard. McKinley was able to win the popular vote by the biggest popular vote margin in 25 years (7.1 to 6.1 million votes) and also won handily in the electoral college.

McKinley’s presidency is often-times classified as mediocre, however, he did much to change America’s standing in the world. For example, in 1898 McKinley declared war against Spain after conflicts in Cuba, starting the first American-foreign major conflict since the War of 1812. The Spanish-American War lasted just a few months and resulted in the acquisition of Puerto Rico, Guam and the Philippines and a new viewpoint on America’s ability to intervene in foreign affairs. McKinley adopted the “Open Door Policy” which allowed for all nations to freely trade with China, and supported this policy when he sent 5000 American troops to shut down the Boxer Rebellion when American missionaries were threatened.

In the election of 1900, McKinley, increasingly popular due to his success in the Spanish-American War, once again beet Bryan by a huge margin. Following his inauguration, McKinley took a tour of the nation, meeting with the public and making speechings. During the tour on September 6, 1901, while McKinley was meeting the public, Leon Czolgosz approached the president with a gun concealed in his handkerchief, and when he reached the front of the crowd, shot the president twice in the stomach.

The president collapsed and the crowd engulfed Czolgosz, stopping his escape. McKinley was taken off the premises and doctors were unable to locate the second bullet which had lodged itself in McKinley’s abdomen. In the days following the attack, McKinley was showing signs of recovery; however, unbeknownst to his doctors, gangrene had spread and poisoned his blood, and would eventually kill him. Czolgosz was sentenced to death by electric shock 7 weeks later. McKinley currently rests in the McKinley National Memorial in Canton, Ohio.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/about-the-white-house/presidents/william-mckinley/
https://www.history.com/topics/us-presidents/william-mckinley
https://www.history.com/news/the-assassination-of-president-william-mckinley
https://millercenter.org/president/mckinley/life-in-brief
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_McKinley
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leon_Czolgosz